I was looking at a lost communication procedure for NARROWS ONE DEPARTURE at KTIW which says “If no transmissions are received for 3 minutes after departure, climb to field altitude direct to SEA VORTAC, thence via assigned route” and started wondering how it is related to the comm failure reg on 91.185. The clearance from the ground usually sounds like “…cleared to xxxx via Narrows One Departure, then as filed, climb and maintain 2000, departure frequency…”
First, it’s reasonable to assume that I’m supposed to fly the lost comm procedure as depicted on the SID if it’s in IMC. But if it’s in VFR, am I supposed to land as soon as practical, or still fly the lost comm procedure as specified by the SID? The procedure would take me to SEA VOR which is directly over KSEA where airline jets are flying underneath or even possibly at the same altitude if some of them decide to go missed. I feel like I would be creating unnecessary hazards for myself and others when I can just land as soon as practical under VFR.
I guess my question is, when does 91.185 supersedes the lost comm procedures specified on SIDs and vice versus? My guess is that 91.185 always takes precedence and that the AVEF applies in this scenario because SID is considered “assigned route” which should be flowed as long as it’s IMC, but in VMC I should land as soon as practicable. Looking forward to hearing any response!
The following terms have been auto-detected the question above and any answers or discussion provided. Click on a term to see its definition from the Dauntless Aviation JargonBuster Glossary.