Welcome Guest. Sign in or Signup

4 Answers

Private carriage for select friends in my plane under Part 91?

Asked by: 2350 views
Commercial Pilot

I am a licensed commercial pilot (>2,000 hrs) with a current Class 2 medical. I obtained the commercial for personal development and maybe insurance discounts, not because I want to become a pilot as my job.

I own a plane (SETP, 5+1 seats) and have had friends ask if I could fly them somewhere if they pay me a day rate + hourly for the plane rental. 

Since this would be private carriage and not common carriage (no holding out, only flying for a few select friends), and it is in a small aircraft, does it require my aircraft to be operated under Part 135 or is Part 91 ok?

AC120-12A seems to suggest that Part 91 is possible. Other interpretations make me think this is not possible (I'm not going to pursue 135 for a couple of flights per year for friends). 

The aircraft is owned by my business in which the aircraft operations are incidental to the main source of income which is not related to aviation. 

Summary: can a friend hire me to fly them somewhere in my plane if I am not in the business of being a commercial operator?

Ace Any FAA Written Test!
Actual FAA Questions / Free Lifetime Updates
The best explanations in the business
Fast, efficient study.
Pass Your Checkride With Confidence!
FAA Practical Test prep that reflects actual checkrides.
Any checkride: Airplane, Helicopter, Glider, etc.
Written and maintained by actual pilot examiners and master CFIs.
The World's Most Trusted eLogbook
Be Organized, Current, Professional, and Safe.
Highly customizable - for student pilots through pros.
Free Transition Service for users of other eLogs.
Our sincere thanks to pilots such as yourself who support AskACFI while helping themselves by using the awesome PC, Mac, iPhone/iPad, and Android aviation apps of our sponsors.

4 Answers



  1. John D Collins on Jul 30, 2021

    No.

    +3 Votes Thumb up 4 Votes Thumb down 1 Votes



  2. Mark Kolber on Jul 30, 2021

    AC129-12A is woefully outdated in that is really does imply that “private carriage” is Part 91. It’s not. “Private carriage” is Part 135 and there is a Part 135 private carriage certificate.

    If you want to, look up the term, “flight department company.” That’s a situation in which
    Company A owns 100% of Company B. Company B has airplane and crew which is used for only one purpose-to provide transportation to its owner, Company A. Nothing meets the definition of “private carriage” more than that. Only one customer. No holding out at all. But it is Part 135.

    Basically, unless it fits a specific exception, providing airplane and crew is “carriage” and involves Part 135.

    0 Votes Thumb up 1 Votes Thumb down 1 Votes



  3. John D Collins on Aug 10, 2021

    FYI https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2021-08-09/faa-proposes-123m-penalties-illegal-charter?utm_medium=email&utm_source=rasa_io&PostID=35433725&MessageRunDetailID=6060220919

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  4. markm on Aug 12, 2021

    Thanks for the replies. I admit I got excited about options after reading AC129-12A but your clarification regarding the op spec and 135 requirements on the aircraft even when flown part 91 tamped down that temporary excitement.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes


The following terms have been auto-detected the question above and any answers or discussion provided. Click on a term to see its definition from the Dauntless Aviation JargonBuster Glossary.

Answer Question

Our sincere thanks to all who contribute constructively to this forum in answering flight training questions. If you are a flight instructor or represent a flight school / FBO offering flight instruction, you are welcome to include links to your site and related contact information as it pertains to offering local flight instruction in a specific geographic area. Additionally, direct links to FAA and related official government sources of information are welcome. However we thank you for your understanding that links to other sites or text that may be construed as explicit or implicit advertising of other business, sites, or goods/services are not permitted even if such links nominally are relevant to the question asked.