Welcome Guest. Sign in or Signup

4 Answers

Multi Engine Currency

Asked by: 6460 views ,
General Aviation

  Pilot 1  - Private Pilot-ME / Commercial-SE Pilot 2 - Private Pilot - SE , Owns Multi Engine Airplane - Currently Working with MEI to get AMEL to add his private   Pilot 1 and Pilot 2 Wants to fly together.  Pilot 1 Says he never flown that Make and Model so he needs to do Solo 3 take offs and landings to be legal on that plane.   Pilot 2 Does not like the idea of Pilot 1 Flying the plane solo, He wants to be there. What should they do?      

Ace Any FAA Written Test!
Actual FAA Questions / Free Lifetime Updates
The best explanations in the business
Fast, efficient study.
Pass Your Checkride With Confidence!
FAA Practical Test prep that reflects actual checkrides.
Any checkride: Airplane, Helicopter, Glider, etc.
Written and maintained by actual pilot examiners and master CFIs.
The World's Most Trusted eLogbook
Be Organized, Current, Professional, and Safe.
Highly customizable - for student pilots through pros.
Free Transition Service for users of other eLogs.
Our sincere thanks to pilots such as yourself who support AskACFI while helping themselves by using the awesome PC, Mac, iPhone/iPad, and Android aviation apps of our sponsors.

4 Answers



  1. John D Collins on Nov 05, 2015

    Assuming pilot 1 is current in a multi engine land aircraft, there is not a legal issue. Currency is in Categrory (Airplane) and Class (Multi engine – land) and is not based on model of aircraft unless the aircraft requires a type rating. Although it is legal if pilot 1 is current even though he has not flown in the particular make and model to carry passengers, it is not necessarily the smart thing to do. I doubt that insurance would cover the flight, but that is not a legal issue.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  2. Jeff on Nov 05, 2015

    What if Pilot 1 is not current? Can he go up with Pilot 2 and be current?

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  3. John D Collins on Nov 06, 2015

    No. Pilot 2 is then a passenger, Pilot 1 can do it solo or with an instructor, but not with a passenger if they are not current.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  4. Mark Kolber on Nov 06, 2015

    Pilot 1 Says he never flown that Make and Model so he needs to do Solo 3 take offs and landings to be legal on that plane.

    Just want to make sure that you understand that there is no rule that requires three solo takeoffs and landings in order to be allowed to take passengers in a particular make and model of airplane.

    If you are indeed asking about passenger-carrying currency, as John said, is aircraft category and class specific (and type if applicable). Either Pilot 1 is current to carry passengers in the category/class or he is not. If not, it doesn’t matter if your passenger (Pilot 2) happens to have a pilot certificate in his pocket with different category and class ratings. He’s still a passenger, just as Pilot 1 is just a passenger when he is sitting in seat 23B on a commercial flight.

    What should you do if Pilot 2 doesn’t want Pilot 1 to get current by himself? Go up with Pilot 2’s CFI.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes


The following terms have been auto-detected the question above and any answers or discussion provided. Click on a term to see its definition from the Dauntless Aviation JargonBuster Glossary.

Answer Question

Our sincere thanks to all who contribute constructively to this forum in answering flight training questions. If you are a flight instructor or represent a flight school / FBO offering flight instruction, you are welcome to include links to your site and related contact information as it pertains to offering local flight instruction in a specific geographic area. Additionally, direct links to FAA and related official government sources of information are welcome. However we thank you for your understanding that links to other sites or text that may be construed as explicit or implicit advertising of other business, sites, or goods/services are not permitted even if such links nominally are relevant to the question asked.