Reading my FAR/AIM tonight, and I got to 91.515. It states that "Notwithstanding $91.119...no person may operate an airplane under VFR at less than (1) One thousand feet above the surface[comma], or 1,000 feet from any mountain, hill......"
I am very familiar with part $91.119 which states that in sparsely populated areas or over open water you can go all the way down to the surface if you like, as long as you are not with 500 ft of a structure, person, boat etc.
The key word in 91.515 is "notwithstanding". I looked it up in the dictionary, just to make sure I had a correct understanding of the word. The dictionary defines it as "in spite of". That being the case 91.515 could read "In spite of 91.119.... no person may operate an airplane under VFR at less than 1000 ft. above the surface[comma], ...." .
Definition of notwithstanding here
This definition, combined with the location of a comma after the word "surface" in 91.515, would seem to indicate that 1000ft AGL is the absolute minimum except during takeoff and landing. Everyone seem to quote 91.119 when talking about minimum altitudes and 91.515 is rarely mentioned.
I would like to know if these sections conflict with each other. If they do not, please explain which one takes precedence, and why. I am sure I am missing something in the verbiage here.
The following terms have been auto-detected the question above and any answers or discussion provided. Click on a term to see its definition from the Dauntless Aviation JargonBuster Glossary.