Glide slope intercept altitude
Asked by: Lemontree 8113 views FAA Regulations, Instrument Rating
In my IR training, I was taught two different ways to shoot a precision approach. One was to follow all the step-down fixes and then intercept the glide slope at the altitude marked with the light bolt symbol in the chart, and the other was to stay at the last assigned altitude for the approach clearance (when getting vectors) or the altitude you descend to for the procedure turn (when shooting full procedure) until intercepting the glide slope.
Instructors who prefer the second way argue that it's the better way because you can stabilize the approach easier and earlier. I agree with them on that point, but I'm not sure it's really the "right" way to shoot the approach, because (1) all precision approach charts specifically mark the intercept altitude with a clear symbol and I think there's a good reason for that; (2) there's a possibility you can intercept the glide slope from above and get a false signal from the system. This is not a problem when I shoot the approach in a familiar airport because I know I'll intercept the glide slope from below at those altitudes, yet if you have to shoot an approach you've never practiced before, how can you be assured that the current altitude you're maintaining will allow you to intercept the glide slope from below?
So my questions are:
(1) Is the second way to shoot a precision approach officially approved by the FAA or ICAO?
(2) Which way is usually preferred among the airline pilots in the US?
The following terms have been auto-detected the question above and any answers or discussion provided. Click on a term to see its definition from the Dauntless Aviation JargonBuster Glossary.